Mosaic Law Build A Railing Around Your Roof

Often older buildings may comply with the code under which they were constructed.

Mosaic law build a railing around your roof.

There was no system of fines to the civil government under the mosaic law. Net bible emphasis mine the moral concept here is integrity. One common example is the command in the mosaic law to build a parapet or rail around the roof of your home. That way you will not be considered guilty of murder if someone falls from the roof.

Instead each property owner had a choice of a not building a rail and risking bloodguilt or b building a rail and avoiding bloodguilt. That way you will not be considered guilty of murder if someone falls from the roof. That way you will not be considered guilty of murder if someone falls from the roof. Since people in that culture spent time on their flat roofs falling off a roof was a potential danger.

Tucked away in the middle of the mosaic law is of all things the following building code. That certainly seems like a moral issue yet i don t see too many roof fences around. In new york city roofs balconies or terraces with slope of 2 4 12 or less and height of 22 feet or greater require railings per 2014 nyc building code section 1509 8. There was no crime of failing to build a rail around a roof.

This case law applies the principle enunciated by the sixth. On the one hand yes do not murder is clearly a moral issue. People do not spend time on slanted roofs however or the roofs of grass huts so that law does not apply everywhere. The barrier onto the roof was the judicial equivalent of a railing.

He could place a barrier to access to the roof. But if he refused to build a railing and no one fell off that was his decision. 22 8 if you build a new house you must construct a guard rail around your roof to avoid being culpable in the event someone should fall from it. Otherwise you might have bloodguilt on your house if anyone should fall from it deut.

When thou buildest a new house then thou shalt make a battlement for thy roof that thou bring not blood upon thine house if any man fall from thence. Someone who went onto a roof that did not have a rail did so of their own free will and chose to take the risk. A wall built around an existing roof old house would not have integrity with the house and be weak. That would suffice judicially.

The only money collected by judges was for restitution to victims. The critical point is this. An example would be the case law that states when you build a new house you shall make a parapet for your roof. Deuteronomy 22 8 nlt when you build a new house you must build a railing around the edge of its flat roof.

So what could have been the civil penalty for failing to build a railing.